50/50 Written by Ski Review Guest on 2007-04-26 10:13:24
Pretty sure this is the ski that everyone is raving about for park. It's built so that the back of the ski is the same as the front. The sidecut is perfectly centered, so if you centre mount the ski, your standing right on top of the sidecut. You could accidently mount they bindings back to front and it wouldn't matter AT ALL! |
sweet Written by Ski Review Guest on 2007-12-19 21:01:03
First things first, this is a different ski. You have to be more centered in your weight distribution because the mounting point is smack-dab center, takes a bit to get used to. I am a skeptic so I imagine that the flex pattern probably differs from tip to tail, so I mounted mine like you'd see in the picture, not the reverse, even though it apparently doesn't matter. I am 165 lbs and 5'8", aggressive and advanced. These ski switch like a dream. They pop like a dream. They slide rails like a dream. The titanal underfoot is a sweet deal on a 400 dollar ski. They are a little weighty and stiff, which makes the ski a little bit much for butters, but makes the ski fly down groomers. I took these into some knee deep heavy snow in the trees and they held their own. certainly no explosivs, but much better than you'd expect from a terrain park ski. in fact, if you mainly are on the park, this ski would actually serve pretty well as an allmountain ski. they busted up crud without a flinch, remind me of how fischer makes most of their skis - stable and fast. if you're looking for a park ski, get this. get this. get this. |
MOGULS? Written by Ski Review Guest on 2008-01-27 07:15:53
anyone taken these through the bumps at all? a |