Real time prices for the Head Mojo 90 2007, or similar ski products:
Written by Ski Review Guest on 12/08
I bought a pair of Monster 88 in 175 cm length but when I tried them out I didn?t like them at all. The same day I tried my friends Mojo 90?s in 186 and they outperformed the Monsters both in hardpack and in 30 cm soft snow. Easier to turn, more stable and better feeling. Surprising but a fact. I sold the Monsters and got a pair of Mojo?s instead.. Maybe the Monsters was too much ski for me..?
Written by Ski Review Guest on 12/13
Anyone have an opinion on these? I previously had Rossi Scratch FS, but want something a bit stiffer for charging and fatter in powder. I have ridden Public Enemies and didn’t like them, think the Mojo 90s could be the ones. I am 5’10” and 80 kilos. Will they be too stiff for my weight and too stiff for park? Bumps? Do they only respond at high speed??
Written by Ski Review Guest on 12/20
I’ve got some Mojo 90’s at 176cm. Pretty damp and fun ski. great on groomers, surprisingly decent in moguls, too short and too much tail for me in powder. 186’s might work better in pow. I’m 5’10, 145 lbs.
Written by Ski Review Guest on 12/20
Rad skis. I love them. Great plowing through the chopped up stuff and surprisingly fast and stable on firm groomers.
Written by Hautokt on 02/19
I bought them in 193. I was dreaming about a freestyle ski that would be a proper size for me (I’m 1.95m), and over several years I try to get them, every time they’re out of order. This year I managed to get a pair, so I mounted them 3cm forward to make them a bit more centered in spins and switch riding. Basically the Mojo 90 is a freeride ski, but its shape was the closest to a freestyle ski compared to other brands’ BC skis, so I chose it for my experimentation. The result is not bad at all. It carves really well even if it’s 90mm wide, and the new big tail brings tons of pop, it’s really playful. The problem is that compared to a proper freestyle ski it’s a razor, and it has a lot less forgiveness! So when you land flat it’s perfect, but when you didn’t finish your spin or you land a bit on your back, it’s like pushing on the “eject” button! All in all I’m really happy of this choice, and it just obliges me to land properly, I’m a bit more anxious when trying a new trick though.
Written by Ski Review Guest on 01/25
Anyone taken these through moguls? How are they edge to edge?
Written by Ski Review Guest on 05/17
Very sweet ski, was looking at purchasing salomon foils but was stoked with the decision to go with the mojo’s. Took a while to get used to on-piste but they carve awesomely when you get them cruising & i wouldn’t go back to a carver. Off piste they are solid & work-it in heavy & fluffy pow big ups
Written by Ski Review Guest on 09/02
I own a pair of these at 186cm. I owned a previous pair of mojos at 179cm and decided to get a bigger version for my new set. I am very impressed, ive had two pairs of Head skis and was very happy each time. Definitely get a pair!
Written by Ski Review Guest on 01/04
So sick on groomers and on that crappy hard bumpy stuff, charge in steeps and awesome for straightlining, very stiff which I think makes them pretty bad in deep powder but awesome in everything else.
Written by Ski Review Guest on 03/06
These skis kill. Went with the 191’s and haven’t regretted them once. For thier size, they are extremely light weight and are built to take abuse. They like to go fast. They plow through slush, crud, and chop like battleships and float on powder. They grip ice and hardpack like a carve ski. Just what I needed to take my game to the next level.
Written by Loftus on 02/15
Skier Height:2.02m Skier Weight:106kg Skier Ability: Internediate Ski length Tested:
Ski Review: Just curious, looking at second hand set of Head Mojo 90’s say 176cms, any thoughts anywhere whether these might suit, or if not why not? Assistance needed.
Written by Ski Review Guest on 11/22
The Mojo 90 plow through crud and heavy stuff. Very stable and stiff. Very stiff..
Mojo 90 gear review by brian