Atomic Metron 9 2007 Ski Review

Model: Atomic Metron 9 (2007)
Size(cm) / Radius(m): 150/? 157/? 164/12 171/? 178/?
Sidecut: 125-74-109

Ski Review Brands

Real time prices for the Atomic Metron 9 2007, or similar ski products:

Reader Ski Reviews of the Atomic Metron 9 2007
Atomic Metron 9 2007
Written by Ski Review Guest on 02/06

Skied on these skis this past weekend.  Great edge grip and light for an all-mountain ski.  Great for people who likes to make short turns or tearing it up on the bumps.  No powder where I was so can’t comment on that aspect. 

Atomic Metron 9 2007
Written by Ski Review Guest on 02/19

Demoed these ski’s and really enjoyed them. I’ve been using rentals and felt stuck at intermediate level. With these ski’s, I managed to step it up a notch. I felt a lot more control, could be more aggressive with turns and increased speed with confidence.

Edge grip was awesome. Even on icy slopes the edge grip was good. There was 3 inches of new snow, but it was just a covering so didn’t get to try true powder either, however through soft snow they were great.

Size size: 171cm My weight: 182 lbs Height: 5 ft 11

Atomic Metron 9 2007
Written by Ski Review Guest on 02/27

This ski ROCKS! I cannot say enough good things, and cannot find any faults (ok, deep pow). I ski 20-30 days a year in the West, expert skier, 5’9”, 155 lb. I tried a few other skis before I stumbled onto this all mountain stick. Due to my own preferences, I narrowed my choices to the Salomon XWing tornado, K2 Recon and Crossfire, Volkl AC3 and AC4, and the Atomic Metron B5. I did’nt even plan on trying the Metron 9 as it is rated as an intermediate ski. Luckily the demo guy suggested I give it a try. It blew everything out of the snow. So easy to turn when going slow yet so fast and stable when letting loose. I haven’t found its limit yet. What is so great is I have no fear whatsoever that these skis will not keep up. short turns, no problem. Long turns…I can throw an arc at speed with so much confidence my hip is almost touching the snow. Edge grip like nothing I ever skied, yet you can feather it with ease. Bumps are no problem either. I don’t have to pressure the tips at all, just stay centered and roll those edges for amazing carves. Get in an aggressive stance and the acceleration is addictive. Pure smooth clean carves every time, unless you want to mellow, then they are a fine at slow speeds too. Never skied such an all around, do anything ski like this before, so much energy yet only when needed. And the price is half what I excepted to pay. I LOVE THIS SKI!!!!! and I have never been an ATOMIC fan, they always seemed over-bearing to me until this one (by the way, if I had to pick another ski, it would have probably been the Tornado - I was able to find its limit pretty quick, but very fun ski. Worst was the B5 - too demanding and way to much ski for having fun all day. The rest were good, but had strengths in certain areas that were offset by weaknesses in other areas. Anyway, just my thoughts.

06-07 ATOMIC METRON 9 PULS, 171cm with ATOMIC 4TiX bindings, got mine for $399 no tax, free shipping online. (for ref. i use Salomon Falcon 9 boots)

Atomic Metron 9 2007
Written by Ski Review Guest on 02/28

Am torn between these and the K2 5 COM for my first skis. Would describe my level as intermediate. If anyone can help that would be great.

Atomic Metron 9 2007
Written by Ski Review Guest on 03/01

These. They will take you into expert level skiing, where the K2s are more of an easy cruising ski, the K2s have a softer flex and less aggressive side cut. price is probably similar, so I would take the Atomics, hands down.

Atomic Metron 9 2007
Written by Ski Review Guest on 03/06

i have skied both. reply to help is correct, yet it depends more on the skier. if you are low level intermedtiate, the K2 might be more forgiving, or if you have no plans to ski off piste the K2 might excel for you now. if you have plans to ski off trail and get more agressive as you go, the metron will grow with you much better. both are under-rated skis. if you ski ice more often, the metrons are very grippy, but come with fully tuned edges tip to tail. as a intermediate, you may want to detune an inch or two past contact points. the K2s seem to come fairly well detuned. if your a good skier dont detune them at all and the grip will thrill you. also, dont be alarmed with concaved bases on atomic skis, they are made that way. grind em flat and they suck. you will probably love either pair, but always demo first if you can. enjoy. eat pasta, ski fasta!

Atomic Metron 9 2007
Written by Ski Review Guest on 11/03

I really want to get these skis after reading your reviews! but I have a seen a lot of metron 9 ppm’s. are the ppm’s different to the normal metron 9’s?!

Atomic Metron 9 2007
Written by Ski Review Guest on 11/10

I got a pair of Metron 9’s mid season last year and they quickly became my favorite ski for eveyday/most conditions.  I was attracted to them because they are the lightest Metron’s you can buy—I like the Metron shape and its versatility but wasn’t up for the weight of B5’s.  The 9’s are a blast—crud, ice, freshies, you name it.  Roll onto the edges in the steeps and they just scream right around—and they are easy all day long skis—ski them with a light touch or crank aggessive turns they do it. Only gap is powder where the sink if it’s deep.  These are absolutely the sleepers of the Metron line—I can see that they’d be good for intermediates, but are great any expert (except maybe big bruiser heavyweight skiers).

Atomic Metron 9 2007
Written by MLH on 11/10

I am at an intermediate level and live on the east coast.  I am looking for an all mountain ski that can handle the ice but also moderatley deep powder.  I have been looking at the following skis (any reccomendations?): K2 Recon, Volkl AC30, Fischer AMC76, Hot Rod Nitrous, Metron B5, Magfire 8.

Atomic Metron 9 2007
Written by Ski Review Guest on 01/19

I can’t say enough about this ski. Advanced skier coming off straight skis Rossi 210 7XKs. This ski ignors crud and and holds an edge everywhere. End of day double black diamond trails are actually fun instead of “no way man”. Stable ski when just high speed cruising is in order and short turns are a ease.  You will not be sorry with this ski!!

Atomic Metron 9 2007
Written by Ski Review Guest on 01/24

Top ski for the aspiring intermediate (me) these ski’s have excellent edge hold, smooth turn initiation & are stable on bumps. I have skied them for the last 2 seasons & have had great fun with these ski’s. would not hesitate to recommend them.

Atomic Metron 9 2007
Written by Ski Review Guest on 02/09

Researched and demoed 20 different skies. I am intermediate-advance looking to excel. Found these skies to be best of all. Great edges, lots of control, takes me on the piste and off piste trails without confidence. Handle medium powder (6-8”) like a dream! Highly recommend!!

Atomic Metron 9 2007
Written by Ski Review Guest on 02/13

Can anyone explain the difference between a metron 9 and the metron 9 ppm? Also, do you recommend them for women?

Atomic Metron 9 2007
Written by Ski Review Guest on 02/13

I’ve been reading up on these ski’s and plan on purchasing this week. The ppm is the Power Puls Medium which is what the 9 uses. If you check out the website below, it explains it. The 7 uses pps for Power Puls Short. I don’t think ski’s care if you’re a man or a woman? Also on the website, check out the “What’s Metron Index?” link to pick your size.

http://www.atomicsnow.com/int/products/alpin/ski/metron/metron-9ppm.html

Atomic Metron 9 2007
Written by Ski Review Guest on 02/18

Read all the good things about this ski here. Convinced by Ski Press World test review. Got myself a pair of last year (06-07) model from online for just $400 in the middle of Jan. Skied four times so far. Love it very much. Now I know what means carving. I would say the skis pushed me from intermediate to advanced level right away. Steeps, Pumps and Ice, whatever it met. The skis just went through it. No fear any more. Very stable and easy to turn. The only thing I am still trying to learn is to control the speed. This ski just run fast even on flat ground. So happy I purchased it!

Atomic Metron 9 2007
Written by Ski Review Guest on 02/21

I just ordered the m9 157. I’m worried that these are to short for my weight.  If so what types of issues will I encounter?

Atomic Metron 9 2007
Written by Ski Review Guest on 02/25

Hi, I consider myself a beginner/intermediate skiier.  Top of beginner level but bottom of intermediate level.  What skiis would be good for me?  I’m about 155lbs, 5’7” tall.

Thanks

Atomic Metron 9 2007
Written by Ski Review Guest on 03/02

Did you looked up the Atomic’s M index? Which one were you suppose to get? The only issue you might encount is sinking into powder while ski slow. Will never be an issue if you are going to ski on hard packed.

I am 125 lb and now I feel 157 is a bit too long for me cs I need to work hard to make short turns.

Atomic Metron 9 2007
Written by Ski Review Guest on 03/02

Atomic has Metron 5 and Metron 7 as well. You need to demo yourself to see which one you like. Otherwise, just pick pick Metron 9 and live with it. It will help you grow and serve you several years to come. Look up the Atomic M index and pick a proper length for your self. Generally, shorter is easier.

Atomic Metron 9 2007
Written by Ski Review Guest on 03/03

If you are looking at the Metron 9. Your Metron index is at 1160 (from your weight, your skiing level—intermediate and turn radius—short). That’s between 150 (for M index 1100) and 157 (for M index 1165). Since Metron is a Ski-Short one, you should go for 150 so you can start easy and grow with it. If you generally do long or medium turns (that will give your M index of 1220) and are willing to push yourself a bit, then you should go for 157 and this one will serve you longer particulary with your weight.

Add review of this ski.